Justice as a false flag operation banner - EU Freedom, Justice & Security

Internet forms an integral part of today's modern times, and so it is in the
EU-Member State Justice systems. In Spain, since January 2016 this system
under the name of LEXNET is obligatory.

Eradicating paper documents within the courts, which had to be handed to,
and in some cases handled by, Procurators, with all (un)necesarry
consequences, seems to be something of the past.

But this also applies to other departments of the State's administrative powers,
such as civil and commercial registry offices, local tax offices, etc.

A few months later, and eventhoug obligatory, it's factual implementation
leaves somewhat to be desired. And as always with mayor changes, it has it
advantages and disadvantages.

In the old times, - knowing at which hours certain officials would be taking
their coffee break, leaving only one or the other official to handle the incoming
documents -, one at least knew (or with a certainty probability could quess), in
which department the procedure would end up, or remain, - sometimes for
years - at the bottom of the pile.

Leaving the door open to either present, or not present, the procedure or
any of it's documents, during either of the coffee breaks.

With the introduction of internet controlled procedures, both the procurators
and inmense paper files on the desks of the officials are a picture of the past.

Well, paper can be replaced by a cd-rom disk or other data carrying technology,
which do not, necessarily oblige to the use of a closed internet mailing circuit.

But it is certainly a relief for citizens not having to contract and pay both an
advocate (to invoke law) as well as a procurator (to represent them) in order to
defend their rights in a court case. As in principle one's advocate does both.

One way or the other, the system however has been able to introduce a new
type of 'gatekeepers', this time the State appointed administrator (as it is the
States' responsability to administer Justice), responsible for administrating the
received electronic documentation, judging it on basic principles and
realocating it to certain departments or courts.

I'm sure that Richelieu would have been very pleased with these measures,
as it would have made it a lot easier to control musketering officials.

On the other hand, with State controlled administers of Justice, as
gatekeepers of the same, the question then arrises who are those
who in representation of the State, appoint - better said; hand pick -
those Judicial administators?

And what about the lack of separation of Powers within the State,
the trias politicas. Wasn't it the general idea Administrative and Judiciary
would remain separate in order to warrant democracy ?

That is, democracy in the factual sense of the word in representation of
all people, and not administered by a totalitarian 50 + 1, tecnocracy.

The first attempt in Spain, to intoduce an electronic justice system, some 12
years ago failed, as it was completely ignored by all Judiciary, Administrative
and Governmental Entities. Let's see how far Lexnet will make it.

Mevr. mr. drª Marian Aletta Does
Abogada - lic. em direito - dutch lawyer